Epstein Secrets

and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶14. 73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exh

EFTA00726015 51. three complaints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney= Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit "B"). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102

Edwards Robert C. Josefsberg Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege 06702-06705 09/16/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola depos Joint-privilege 06706-06708 10/14/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege 06715-06719 10/09/2009

tos & Lehrman BATES DATE 12 FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 04202.04206 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards William Berger Epstein's attorneys & Bob Josephsberg have filed several motions on limits of the no contact order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to

Edwards Robert C. Josefsberg Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege 06702-06705 09/16/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola depos Joint-privilege 06706-06708 10/14/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege 06715-06719 10/09/2009

tos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION DBJECTION 04202.04206 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards William Berger Epstein's attorneys & Bob Josephsberg have filed several motions on limits of the no contact order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to