Epstein Secrets

ase, is not a 23 THE COURT: Thank you. 24 matter which would involve bankruptcy estate 24 MR. FARMER: Thank you, your Honor. 25 assets going to Mt. Epstein. Unlike 25 THE COURT: Mr. Lichtman, Mr. Scherer, your 4 (Pµges 13 to 16 OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305)358-8875 EFTA00206627

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00206624 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

ase, is not a 23 THE COURT: Thank you. 24 matter which would involve bankruptcy estate 24 MR. FARMER: Thank you, your Honor. 25 assets going to Mt. Epstein. Unlike 25 THE COURT: Mr. Lichtman, Mr. Scherer, your 4 (Pµges 13 to 16 OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305)358-8875 EFTA00213920

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00213917 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations; Leslie Wexner, a. client of the Plaintiff; (e) Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not asking any questions about Edwards' clients; Edwards targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close

nvestigative techniques and other Epstein matters; j) In the month of September, 2009, emails were exchanged between Edwards and William Berger ("Berger"), a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. k) On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email t

avid Copperfield (illusionist); (d) Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations. Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not asking any questions about Edwards' clients; Edwards targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close

nvestigative techniques and other Epstein matters; j) In the month of September, 2009, emails were exchanged between Edwards and William Berger ("Berger"), a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. k) On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email t

g them there wee en ongoing Imrnagelten Into their clans However. May say. the once was emceeing the tact Mat they needy herd signed • osoeman deal MT Epstein -Ong to Me modem the U S Attomays *Mat In Janata 2008 and May 2000 sent Us* notecotton' 'mania to ins Mined Maims laying 'Pas Carl Hanna under Inve

pstein woud appear in a sawn laWal Fame. Chat Judge 811 WOW. wed manedu one of Me victima. end The Pain Bead) Poet sagN the unsealing of the evened Berger refers ail as a 'swell/wan 0aai • 'Why wee li so Imported 'or he godmmont to make ads deal?' Berger asked ttelalcaay 'We have not yet had honest ex

n a small towel. Former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who represents one of the victims, and The Palm Beach Post sought the unsealing of the agreement. Berger refers to it as a "sweetheart deal.” "Why was itso important for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had

ee or “America's Best Dance... lesbian sex slave and who visited him behind bars 67 times, has also been served with a subpoena. Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, who has a real-estate holding company in New York, has already been deposed about a building he owns, 301 E. 66th St. “Jeffrey rents several apartme