Epstein Secrets

tiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Jean Luc Bruhnel. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 05/28/2010 76 RESPONSE/REPLY to (545 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, Pl

wide document retrieval service. - OR - Call 1.866.540.8818. US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Florida Southern (Miami) :10cv21586 Podhurst Orseck, PA'. Epstein This case was retrieved from the court on Friday. June 11, 2010 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lea

/25/2010) RESPONSE/REPLY Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into The Registry of the Court by Podhurst Orseck, P.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter Dated December 6. 2007 from US Attorney's Office to Defendant's Counsel, # 2 Exhibit Transcript of Hearing

tiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Jean Luc Bruhnel. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 05/06/2010 107 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment Including Supporting Memorandum of Law by Jeffrey Epstein. Re

Yes Statute: 28:1391 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Personal Injury Attorneys Katherine Warthen Ezell [COR LD NTC] Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg Et Al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagter Street Suite 800 Miami , FL 33130-1780 USA 305-358-2800 Fax: 305-358-2382 Email: Ke

against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell

“II.” Before the deposition took place, Brunel’s attorney (Tama Kudman of West Palm Beach) contacted Edwards to delay the deposition date. Eventually Kudman informed Edwards in January 2009 that Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return. This information was untrue; Brunel

aints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one aml a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell

“II.” Before the deposition took place, Brunel’s attorney (Tama Kudman of West Palm Beach) contacted Edwards to delay the deposition date. Eventually Kudman informed Edwards in January 2009 that Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return. This information was untrue; Brunel