Epstein Secrets

on. Before the deposition took place, Brunel's attorney (Tama Kudman of West Palm Beach) contacted Edwards to delay the deposition date. Eventually Kudman informed Edwards in January 2009 that Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return. This information was untrue; Brun

edule in this case, 2 EFTA00722412 Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2010 Page 3 of 16 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-NIARRA/JOHNSON and to Order Epstein to immediately file an Answer to MJ's Complaint or alternatively to Strike Epstein's pleadings. FACTUAL BACKGROUND At any he

rm. Defendant identifies Jean Luc Brunel in his probation papers as residing with him within the period of December 2009 to February 2010, when Ms. Kudman represented him to be out of Florida. As indicated in our previous pleading, Mr. Brunel was served for deposition, and his counsel Ms. Kudman repr

of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant. / Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81

wards to call me to discuss this. Thank you Sent from my iPhone Tama Beth Kudman On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Beth Williamson a wrote: Dear Ms. Kudman: My name is Beth. I am assisting Brad Edwards in the Epstein matters. I just wanted to follow-up on the voicemail I left you. I understand your cli

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 547-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2010 Page 1 of 2 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Notice of Supplemental Authority on Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for an Order to Show Cause and for an Order to Compel and Incorporated Memorandum o

rm. Defendant identifies Jean Luc Brunel in his probation papers as residing with him within the period of December 2009 to February 2010, when Ms. Kudman represented him to be out of Florida. As indicated in our previous pleading, Mr. Brunel was served for deposition, and his counsel Ms. Kudman repr

STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 NOTICE OF

y Defendant Epstein. Shortly after Brunel was served, counsel for Jane Doe was contacted by Tama Beth Kudman, Esq., a licensed attorney in Florida. Kudman stated that she represented Brunel with regard to the subpoena and that she would produce Brunel for deposition in West Palm Beach if Jane Doe woul

STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 PLAINTIFF

II." Before the deposition took place, Brunt's attorney (Tama Kudman of West Palm Beach) contacted Edwards to delay the deposition date. Eventually Kudman informed Edwards in January 2009 that Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return. This information was untrue; Brune

2014 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida RE: Jane Does I and 21 United Stales Case No. : 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, we have been in litigation for more than six years on a case under the Crime Victims' Rights Act — a case that invol

tiff's MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Jean Luc Bruhnel. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (Kudman, Tama) (Entered: 03/12/2010) 05/28/2010 76 RESPONSE/REPLY to (545 in 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, Pl

: Jurisdiction: 07/21/2008 Judge Kenneth A Marra Magistrate Judge Linnea Personal Injury (360) Diversity 9:08-cv-80119-KAM None Diversity R Johnson Cma Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Defendant Class Code: CLOSED Closed: Yes Statute: 28:1332 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Descri