Epstein Secrets

ent 8:12 35:19 37:5 41:17 41:22,23 42:8 46:6,13 COHEN 2:10 affidavit 18:11 24:5 arguments 8:13 42:16

21 37:12 37:25 40:5,20 46:3,5 47:1 48:8 rights 29:18 rise 3: I RMR 1:23 50:8,19 ROBINSON 2:10 Rockenbach 10:18,19 13:22 15:15,24 17:7 20:18 Rosenfeldt 1:5 3:7 11:21 Rothstein 1:5 3:7 11:21 24:17,23 25:4 Rothstein's 11:22 RPR 1:23 50:8,19 rule 15:10 32:1,7 ruled 23:16 ruling 25:24 Run 41:4

presented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her atto

t 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00726030 have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

ice list below. RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, PLLC By: /s/ Chad P. Pugatch CHAD P. PUGATCH (

t recall. Q Did you ever learn that privilege was being asserted with respect to the production of any emails that were contained on a Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler server? A Separate from a conversation with my attorneys, I don't recall. Q Are you aware, as you sit here today, that federal bankrupt

presented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her atto

Docket 01/1/2.215 Page 35 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603b§ Filed 04/u44/11 Page 34 Ot 3V have run a giant Pont scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

P. Pugatch, Esq. Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen, PLLC 11 EFTA00793509 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc

ions concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are yo

presented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Greaser, and Edwards understood that her atto

Case 9:08-cv-80C6st gsi-1346tuRrgwit 2en ofatergieocroF40 c. osa l'e)W 0,15 Page 35 of have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law finn of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative