Epstein Secrets

he Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule r er eeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Bruce E. Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. se rZ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA

a Sponte Rule 11 Order Bruce E. Reinhart seeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

D ADJUDGED that Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. ge rZ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA

ative for a Sua Sponte Rule ut.t C. scut beeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA00205843

a Sponte Rule 11 Order Bruce E. Reinhart seeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

D ADJUDGED that Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. ge rZ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA

in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule seeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Bruce E. Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. se rZ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA

a Sponte Rule 11 Order Bruce E. Reinhart seeks leave to intervene as a party-in-interest under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reinhart seeks to intervene to file a motion for sanctions based on allegedly "unfounded factual and legal accusations made about Movant in Plaintiffs' Moti

out Movant in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act." (DE 79 at 1). In that motion, Plaintiffs alleged that Reinhart, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, "joined Epstein's payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein's criminal liability" and

D ADJUDGED that Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 26ih day of September, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 14 EFTA00622806

EFTA00188726 EFTA00188727 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2015 Page 6 of 10 then. Plaintiffs alleged that Mr. Reinhart gave "at least the improper appearance" of having made a decision in Mr. Eptsein's favor in his own self-interest, specifically to obtain "favorable

" claim. That claim was made by Bruce Reinhart who — like Dershowitz — had previously represented Jeffrey Epstein's interests in related litigation. Reinhart moved to intervene in this case to contest the victims' allegations that Reinhart (a former prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office investigating

l Procedure. They are ordered not to re- litigate any issues previously litigated by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in this action. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this day of ,201 KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: All counsel EFTA00188716 EFTA00188717 Case

to Response to Motion re12 MOTION to Intervene MOTION for Sanctions OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A SUA SPONTE RULE 11 ORDER filed by Bruce Reinhart. (Reinhart, Bruce) (Entered: 05/23/2011) 05/30/2011 M RESPONSE in Opposition reji MOTION Motion to Supplement Authorities re IQ Plaintiffs MOTION Jane Doe #1

D. 2. The stay of discovery pending ruling on the government's motion to dismiss entered November 8, 2011 [DE# 123] is LIFTED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this 18th day of June, 2013. United States District Judge cc. All counsel 14 _SEALED /' NOT SEALED EFTA00177806

rection was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (Is) (Entered: 06/22/2009) MOTION to Set Aside Default by Sarah Kellen. (Reinhart, Bruce) (Entered: 06/23/2009) Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production by Jane Doe. Responses due by 7/27/2009 A

not be filed electronically, they must be filed in the conventional paper format in the division where the judge is chambered. The Clerk contacted Chambers and corrected the docket text to indicate the document is an emergency matter. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must c