Epstein Secrets

claim. That claim was made by Bruce Reinhart who — like Dershowitz — had previously represented Jeffrey Epstein's interests in related litigation. Reinhart moved to intervene in this case to contest the victims' allegations that Reinhart (a former prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office investigating

PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION UNDER RULE 24(B). 7 During the hearing on Reinhart's intervention motion, the Government stood silent about the accuracy of Reinhart's affidavit. Much later, after the Court had denied the motion, the Government admitted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn

2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEAL

EFTA00188726 EFTA00188727 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2015 Page 6 of 10 then. Plaintiffs alleged that Mr. Reinhart gave "at least the improper appearance" of having made a decision in Mr. Eptsein's favor in his own self-interest, specifically to obtain "favorable

" claim. That claim was made by Bruce Reinhart who — like Dershowitz — had previously represented Jeffrey Epstein's interests in related litigation. Reinhart moved to intervene in this case to contest the victims' allegations that Reinhart (a former prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office investigating

sly and improperly published falsehoods, abusing the litigation privilege, as well as this Court's rulings. But the docket sheets and courtrooms of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida should not be used as a bulletin board to which irrelevant, baseless, and ill-willed reputational attacks can

ein, blocking his prosecution for federal crimes in the Southern Districdt of Florida. In RFP No. 16, the victims have sought documents showing that Reinhart learned confidential, non- public information about Epstein matter. The Court will recall that Reinhart has filed a sworn affidavit with this Court,

he victims have sought documents showing that Reinhart learned confidential, non- public information about Epstein matter. The Court will recall that Reinhart has filed a sworn affidavit with this Court, in which he flatly declared that while he was a prosecutor in the Office: "I never learned any confide

2255, after Epstein has signed this agreement and been sentenced. Upon the execution of this agreement, the United States will file a motion with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for the appointment of a guardian ad them for these parsons. Epstein's counsel may contact the identified indi

nd Roxburgh were not deposed, but the others were.) See depositions of these individuals in various Epstein civil cases. On information and belief, Reinhart's representation of these individuals was paid, directly or indirectly, by Epstein. Such representations are in contravention of Justice Department

the individuals referred to in paragraph (7), supra, elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not conteat the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives hi

ant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. WitiCgapthlui_afte,r_to imn-prosecution agreemenc-was-signed, Reinhart left the Office and immediately went into private practice as a "white collar" criminal defense attorney. His office coincidentally happened to be

the individuals referred to in paragraph (7), supra, elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not conteat the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives hi

rection was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile the document. (Is) (Entered: 06/22/2009) MOTION to Set Aside Default by Sarah Kellen. (Reinhart, Bruce) (Entered: 06/23/2009) Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Response to Plaintiff's Request for Production by Jane Doe. Responses due by 7/27/2009 A

er by Jeffrey Epstein re 6 Order Setting Status Conference (Pike. Michael) (Entered: 06/03/2010) ORDER requiring compliance with Local Rule 16.1 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Signed by Judge Alan S. Gold on 6/7/2010. (dgj) (Entered: 06/07/2010) NOTICE of Settlement by Podhurst Orseck