Epstein Secrets

al.” And it was “a significant . inducement” — for Epstein to accept the state’s deal, observed the state judge who accepted his plea, County Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo. Epstein now faces at least a dozen civil lawsuits in federal and state courts filed by young women who said they had sex with him and now are seeki

ECOMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST TELEPHONE:[ ss. FAX: (561) 688-3355 DATE: 6/17/2009 TIME: 1:00 AM TO: DET. [ FAX NUMBER: (561) 650-6951 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 7 REMARKS: The following table itemizcs the results. AREA PHONE CALL TRIES ACCEPTED CALL RESTRICTED ITEM CODE NUMBER QUAN

aL" And it was "a significant inducement" for Epstein to accept the state's deal, observed the state judge who accepted his plea, County Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo. Epstein now faces at least a dozen civil lawsuits in federal and state courts filed by young women who said they had sex with him and now are

AGE 01/07 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST TELEPHONE: FAX: DATE: 6/17/2009 TIME: 1:00 AM TO: FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 7 REMARKS: The following table itemizes the results. AREA PHONE CALL TRIES ACCEPTED CALL RESTRICTED ITEM CODE NUMBER

al." And it was "a significant inducement" for Epstein to-accept the state% deal, observed the state judge who accepted his plea, County Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo. Epstein now faces at least a dozen civil lawsuits in federal and state courts filed by young women who said they had sex with him and now are

of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Patin Beach, FL 33401-6235 TO: ORGANIZATION: FAX #: SUBJECT:S i FROM: • x) NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: COMMENTS: Original document: To follow via regular mail . To follow via Federal Express tz _vio follow via hand deli

offender, he was not to have contact with any of his victims. During the course of his guilty pleas on June 30, 2008, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo ordered Epstein “not to have any contact, direct or indirect” with any victims. She also expressly stated that her no-contact order applied to “all o

ned in that action.” AMEC Civil, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., ___S0.2d__, 2010 WL 1542634 at *2 (Fla. 1* Dist. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting Kimbrell v. Paige, 448 So.2d 1009, 1012 (Fla. 1984). Obviously, any question of improper “pumping” of a 11 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013380 --- PAGE BREAK --- particular cas