Epstein Secrets

ea agreement was signed, Jane Doe #1 was contacted to be advised regarding the resolution of the investigation. On October 26, 2007, Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe #1. The Special Agents explained that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, he would be requir

t 247 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2014 Page 13 of 13 Fax: (305) 358-2006 rblackQrovblack.com joerczekQrovblack.com Attorneys for Intervenors /s/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Tele: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 owlmgw(aatt.net Attorney for

said Cassell, who is based in Salt Lake City. But one of Epstein's attorney's, Martin Weinberg, based in Boston, disputed those characterizations. Weinberg said Monday that the plea agreement was "reached in good faith" and that "it's not a fair conclusion" to describe the agreement as either improper o

923 D.0 Docket No.9 OS•cv.80736-KASI JANE DOE NO. I. JANE DOE NO 2. Plasottifs•AppcIlett setup UNITED STATES OF Al 'MC Dtforbeti. ROY BLACK. MARTIN 0 WEINBERG. SEEFRE1 EPSTEIN. Intentoon•Appelloote Appeals eons the Weed States Amite Coon fo the &Mika) APma of Fkuidn tAptil IS 2014) Berme PRYOR Intl MA

sion of victim/witness work files to case file. E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 2007-01-01 (U) EC for submission of victim/wItness work files to case file. E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 2006-01-01 2 (U) EC for submission of victim/witness work files to case file. E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 2006-01-01 j (U) EC for submission of victi

of victim/witness work flies to case file. E. Nesbitt kuyricendall 2006-01-01 3 (U) EC for submission of victim/witness work files to case file. E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 2007-01-01 (U) EC for submission of victim/witness work files to case file. E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 2007-01-01 (U) EC for submission of victim/wItn

Privacy Act of 1974 (PA) (Title 5, United States Code. Section 552a); and/or Litigation. FOIA/PA Litigation Executive Order Applied Requester: Marlin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Identification Number: 1203982-1 Title of Case: • He 31E-MM-108062-1A Serials Reviewed: All Section

tion Executive Order Applied Requester: Marlin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Iden

ividual #28 (return date 5/1/07) 4/20/2007 Subpoena to Adult Video Warehouse (return date 5/1/07) 4/24/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 21 4/24/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of Individual #37 22 4/24/2007 Subpoena to New York Strategy Group, LLC Custodian of Records (return date 5/

letter from Villafatia 3/4/2010 Roy Black and Martin Weinberg Critton Letter on thoughts and issues concernin

il containing Acosta edits to Agreement 9/24/2007 Villafalia Lefkowitz Email - 1 page with nine page NPA (3 signature pages) attached 9/24/2007 Weinberg, Lourie, Garcia Villafana Email containing Acosta's final edits and asking to discuss potential victim representative 9/24/2007 Acosta, Sloman,

ms and my credibility by asserting that I had told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein."); (DE 403-18, ¶21) (FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall: "I was concerned that if the victims were informed of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, which included an option for victims to seek monetary damages

33131 Tele Fax: E-Mail: E-Mail: s/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.

q. (FL Bar No. 42201) BLACK SREBNICK & KORNSPAN P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Tele Fax: E-Mail: E-Mail: s/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. (MA Bar No. 519480) 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, Massachusetts 02116 Tele: Fax: E-Mail

greement describing Epstein’s witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER” On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern

aim, particularly where Epstein fails to allege that he was required to do something as the result of Edwards’ pursuit of the claims against him, See Marty v. Gresh, 501 So.2d 87, 90 (Fla, 1* Dist. Ct. App. 1987) (affirming summary judgment on an abuse of process claim where “appellant’s lawsuit caused