Epstein Secrets

rolling." Freemanville Water Sp., Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, 563 F.3d 1205, 1209 (1 I th Ci

rst, they provide notice to the enjoined party of precisely what it must do to avoid being held in contempt—the party cannot be left guessing. See McDonald's Corp. v. Robertson, 147 F.3d 1301, 1311 (11th Cir. 1998). Second, a specific and reasonably detailed order is easy to enforce, while a vague order is no

*2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the pr

ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto

*2, *9-10, *13 (citation omitted). Nonetheless, a band of other courts in our area have endorsed the pr

ents a live case or controversy, and the federal court must dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."); Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 489 F.3d 1156, 1161 (11th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he issue of constitutional standing is jurisdictional ...."); National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Norto