Epstein Secrets

ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed this2b, j day of December, 2008. A.A. Marie Villafafia, q. -4- EFTA00234652 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER

Friday, June 27, 2008 10:00 AM To: Jack Goldberger Subject Have a great weekend! EFTA00234612 Exhibit 11 EFTA00234613 Jack Goldberger From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:31 AM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFL

not hesitate to contact me or Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall at (561) 822-5946. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafala Assistant United States Attorney cc: Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I. Ms. Clearetha Wright, Victim-Witness Coordinator, U.S. Attorney's

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters are intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical, emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

epresentative will be simultaneously representing parties that may be in conflict, in violation of Rule 1.7. For these reasons, we believe that Ms. Villafana's interpretation of the Agreement in connection with the attorney representative's role in the settlement process must be rejected. Second Issue: W

refer to the plea and sentencing as though it will be in January; Mr. Krisher's office has not confirmed any date; and Mr. Goldberger recently told Marie Villafafia that "there is no date." I must reiterate that a delayed guilty plea and sentencing — now more than two months beyond the original deadline — is un

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters are intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—a status requiring physical, emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

le of making their own decisions. llowever. the USA() included into the Agreement that we pay fir the attorney representative -- when originally Ms. Villafana stated that the representative could he paid for by us or the federal court. See e-mail from to Lelkowitz dated September 23. 2007. RFP MIA 000027

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended are in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—I swum requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the deli ndant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of such

007 Page 6 fictitious "rights" or invited to make sworn written or in-court testimonial statements against Mr. Epstein at such pmceedings. as Ms.. Villalana repeatedly maintained they had the right to do. Additionally, it was and remains our position that any notification should he by mail and that all

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended are in fact not victims us defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines—u status requiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the defendant—it was and remains our position that these women may be notified of suc

ge 3 was identified in previous correspondence as a person who remained on the Government's list of "victims" even after (at least according to Ms. Villufana's letter) the list was subjected to careful multi-party review. Ms.. Miller's sworn statement clearly reflects the fact that she is not a "victim'

shold contention that many of those to whom 3771 notification letters arc intended arc in fact not victims as defined in the Attorney General's 2000 Victim Witness Guidelines--u status rtmuiring physical. emotional or pecuniary injury of the delimdant—it was and remains our position that these women may he notified of su