Epstein Secrets

ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed this2b, j day of December, 2008. A.A. Marie Villafafia, q. -4- EFTA00234652 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 35-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER

Friday, June 27, 2008 10:00 AM To: Jack Goldberger Subject Have a great weekend! EFTA00234612 Exhibit 11 EFTA00234613 Jack Goldberger From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:31 AM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFL

not hesitate to contact me or Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall at (561) 822-5946. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafala Assistant United States Attorney cc: Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I. Ms. Clearetha Wright, Victim-Witness Coordinator, U.S. Attorney's

the role of the attorney representative and the settlement process for § 2255 claims pursuant to Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement. First Issue: The Settlement Process and the Role of the Attorney Representative. The settlement procedure we propose, and which we believe is made clear by the Agreement, is reasonabl

nduct of any particular professional, we cannot escape the conclusion that the cumulative effect of the conduct of Assistant United States Attorney Marie Villafana led your Office to take positions during the investigation and negotiation of this matter that has led to unprecedented federal overreaching. In fac

he grand jury issued subpoenas to the records-custodian and employees of Epstein's businesses for all financial transactions from 2003 forward, Ms. Villafana (who we were told was not authorized to act in this regard without supervisory approval) promised to close the money-laundering investigation "if th

!gement from you that Mr. Epstein's waiver would not stretch past settlement. Ms. mimics to espouse this erroneous interprctat ion. F. Ms. and The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. Epstein has agreed to settle civil claims. First, sh

nduct of any particular professional, we cannel escape the conclusion that the cumulative effect of the conduct of Assistant United States Attorney Marie Villafana led your Office to take positions during the investigation and negotiation of this matter that has led to unprecedented federal overreaching. In fac

t was remotely similar to the federal investigation fix the prosecution of this matter. and that ease has since been distinguished as well. B. Mg. Villafana Prompted An Unduly Invasive linvestiantion Of Mr. Epstein. Ms. investigation of Mr. Epstein raises serious questions. Despite the. IS that she was

hat Mr. Epstein's waiver would not stretch past settlement. Ms. Villafana continues to espouse this erroneous interpretation. E. Ms. Villafana ad The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. Villalima has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. Epstein has agreed to settle civil claims.

epresentative will be simultaneously representing parties that may be in conflict, in violation of Rule 1.7. For these reasons, we believe that Ms. Villafana's interpretation of the Agreement in connection with the attorney representative's role in the settlement process must be rejected. Second Issue: W

refer to the plea and sentencing as though it will be in January; Mr. Krisher's office has not confirmed any date; and Mr. Goldberger recently told Marie Villafafia that "there is no date." I must reiterate that a delayed guilty plea and sentencing — now more than two months beyond the original deadline — is un

the role of the attorney representative and the settlement process for § 2255 claims pursuant to Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement. First Issue: The Settlement Process and the Role of the Attorney Representative. The settlement procedure we propose, and which we believe is made clear by the Agreement, is reasonabl

le of making their own decisions. llowever. the USA() included into the Agreement that we pay fir the attorney representative -- when originally Ms. Villafana stated that the representative could he paid for by us or the federal court. See e-mail from to Lelkowitz dated September 23. 2007. RFP MIA 000027

the role of the attorney representative and the settlement process for § 2255 claims pursuant to Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Agreement. First Issue: The Settlement Process and the Role of the Attorney Representative. The settlement procedure we propose, and which we believe is made clear by the Agreement, is reasonabl

from you or your stalT(and sometimes from Ms. hermit) on a particular issue, only to subsequently receive a contradictory interpretation FM111 Ms. Villafana that negates our prior common understanding. I ler misinterpretations appear to be attempts to effectively change the spirit and the meaning of the

o espouse this erroneous interpretation. rstated the scope of Mr. lipstein's waiver of began asserting that Mr. Epstein has waived E. aslIS and The Settlement Process. We are concerned that Ms. Villalitna has repeatedly attempted to manipulate the process under which Mr. E astein has a reed to settle civil claims