Epstein Secrets

ovision expanded as [USAO-SDFL prosecutor Maria] Villafana and defense counsel exchanged drafts of, first,

edged that investigators were aware of Epstein's longtime relationship with a close female friend who was a well- known socialite, but, according to Villafaha, in 2007, they "didn't have any specific evidence against her." Accordingly, Villafaila believed that the only "co-conspirators" of Epstein who wou

nited States v. Scaipa, 913 F.2d 993 (2d Cir. 1990) 159, 160, 162, 164 United States v. Scaipa, 913 F.3d 993 (2d Cir. 1990) 42 United States v. Schaefer, No. 17 Cr. 400 (HZ), 2019 WL 267711 (D. Or. Jan. 17, 2019) 86 United States v. Schafrick, 871 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1989) 121 United States v. Sch

e from its prior Order. Defendant has not filed any response to the instant Motion, and a hearing was held on the same on March 13, 2007, at which Ann Marie C. Villafana, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Villafana"), Andrew C. Lourie, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Lourie"), and Patrick M. Hunt, Esquire, AFPD (hereinafter "

response to the instant Motion, and a hearing was held on the same on March 13, 2007, at which Ann Marie C. Villafana, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Villafana"), Andrew C. Lourie, Esquire, AUSA (hereinafter "Lourie"), and Patrick M. Hunt, Esquire, AFPD (hereinafter "Hunt") 2 EFTA01657896 Case 9:06-cr-8

eld that relevant conduct under 1B1.3 must be criminal. United States v. Norris, 452 F.3d 1275, 1281 n. 1 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing United States v. Schaefer, 291 F.3d 932, 939-40 (7th Cir. 2002); United States v. Dove, 247 F.3d 152, 155 (4th Cir. 2001); United States v. Peterson, 101 F.3d 375, 385-86 (

ment, the defendant asks the Court to order discovery and conduct a hearing. In short, 10 The OPR Report further reflects that in OPR's interview of Villafana, she reported that she did not have anyone in mind aside from the four individuals named in the "co-conspirator" provision: "Villafaiia told OPR th

67,68,71 United States v. Scarpa, 897 F.2d 63 (2d Cir. 1990) 69 United States v. Scarpa, 913 F.2d 993 (2d Cir. 1990) passim United States v. Schaefer, No. 17 Cr. 400 (HZ), 2019 WL 267711 (D. Or. Jan. 17, 2019) 121 xxi EFTA00099962 United States v. Schalk-id-, 871 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1989) 1

SERVICE LIST United States v. Adam G. McDaniel Case No. 06-80058-Cr-Zloch/Snow Andrew Lourie Assistant U.S. Attorney [email protected] A. Marie Villafaiia Assistant U.S. Attorney [email protected] U.S. Attorney's Office 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telep

tes v. Randall, 157 F.3d 328, 331 (5th Cir. 1998) (citing Peterson); United States v. Shafer, 199 F.3d 826, 830-31 (6th Cir. 1999); United States v. Schaefer, 291 F.3d 932, 938-41 (7th Cir. 2002). Cf. United States v. Norris, 452 F.3d 1275, 1281 n.1 (1 I th Cir. 2006); United States v. Amedeo, 370 F.3d 1

edged that investigators were aware of Epstein's longtime relationship with a close female friend who was a well- known socialite, but, according to Villafana, in 2007, they "didn't have any specific evidence against her." Accordingly, Villafaila believed that the only "co-conspirators" of Epstein who wou

, 68, 71 United States v. Scam pa, 897 F.2d 63 (2d Cir. 1990) 69 United States v. Scam pa, 913 F.2d 993 (2d Cir. 1990) passim United States v. Schaefer, No. 17 Cr. 400 (HZ), 2019 WL 267711 (D. Or. Jan. 17, 2019) 121 xxi EFTA00103020 United States v. Schafrick, 871 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1989) 18