Epstein Secrets

y, and, at a minimum, provided the victims with Belohlavek’s contact information. Acosta could have interacted with the State Attorney, or instructed Villafana or others to do so, to ensure the state intended to make notifications in a way that reached the most possible victims and that it had the informatio

ons leading to the agreement: former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and former AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subject submitted written responses detailing their involvement in the federal investigation of Epstein, the drafting and execution of the NPA,

is,~ on~ ~roscclilion_.Agrccmcnt and agrees to somrly. with. thcrp. By; CA/ Aronberg-000777 R:. AtEXANDERACOSTA UNITED s:r'.iTESATI◊R.NEY • A. :MARIE VILLAFANA AssfsTANT fos .• ATTQ~N-tY ·OERALi;:>.L13FCbUJ{t;:ESQ: C0VNSELTQ JEFFREY EJJ,SJEJN LiLLY ANN'SANCIJ~Z; isQ'. NFTORNEY FQR J½FFREY EPSTEIN FILED

.that he understands the clarifications to the Non- Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY A. MARIE VILLAFASA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated: JEFFREY EPSTEIN GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: LILLY ANN'SANCHEZ, BS' ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

prosecutors, such consultations may be limited to gathering information from victims and conveying only nonsensitive data and public information.”443 Villafaha’s concern about generating potential impeachment evidence by informing victims of their potential to recover monetary damages from Epstein was not un

, the possibility of a severe sentence is a significant factor in assessing the risk of flight. See Jackson, 823 F.2d at 7; see also United States v. Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 618 (10th Cir. 2003) (defendant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness ofthe charges against her gave her a strong

8 To: Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Rolando Garcia, Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Region From: cc: A. Marie Villafafia Drew Oosterbaan Myesha Braden INTRODUCTION This third supplement summarizes the changes to the indictment and prosecution memo since the first p

y a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions of release will assur the defendant's appearance in court as required. See, r., United States Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 616 (10th r. i 2003); United States Xulam, 84 F.3d 441, 442 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Ur(1ed States Kirk, 992 F.2d 1218 (6th Cir.1993)(u

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Vi°Mena. Ann Mane C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday. July 31, 2007 1:37 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Menchel, Matthew (US

Cir.1998) "Arguments inadequately briefed in the opening brief are waived."). III. CONCLUSION We AFFIRM the district court's order dismissing Ms. Cisneros's ATS claims for lack of jurisdiction. We also AFFIRM the district court's giant of summary judgment on the § 2255 claims for failure to produce e