Epstein Secrets

d May 31, 2007, to J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc., J. Epstein & Co., Inc.; Epstein Interests; and Financial Thust Company Inc. Dear Ms. Villafana: I write to respond to the subpoenas served on the above entities all dated May 31, 2007. Each of the subpoenas has a substantively identical Attac

DNYGM 02771865 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00258673 EFTA01338177 LAW orrice., or Gmtuan B. LEFGOLTIZT, A. Marie Villaftula, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 12, 2007 Page 3 If you have any q

TABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS A. Marie Villafana, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney Office o

a creditor, a person reporting One °State transocarins; a trustee or fester of any IndivIdurf TenoteitOM arengeMant, a Coverdell ESA. an 1-19A, an Archer lit8A . (noluding a Medicare Advantage MS.A);.certaii corP0M9 certain dorm's of motor vehicles, boats, and ulVanes; en lender who acquires an Inte

exchange, a arediter, a person reporting reel estate traneankente a testae or issuer of any tndrititu.F retirement orrongemcM, a Coverdell ESA, an Archer MBA (including a Medreannaaloioe ?USN: certain corporations; and a lender who eocNires an interest In secured property or who nos reason to now th

d May 31, 2007, to J Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc., J. Epstein & Co., Inc.; Epstein Interests; and Financial Trust Company, Inc. Dear Ms. Villafana: I write to respond to the subpoenas served on the above entities all dated May 31, 2007. Each of the subpoenas has a substantively identical Attac

chango; a creditor; a parson reporting real estate troncaotions; a trustee or Issuer of any Individual rothernent arrzngernent, a Coverdsli ESA, an Archer MBA (including a Medlcare+Choice MSA); certain corporations; and a lender who acquires an Interest In soared property or who has reason to know th

the government is under no obligation to seek out potentially exculpatory 303 See United States v. Frick, 490 F.2d 666, 671 (5th Cir. 1978) (citing Archer v. United States, 393 F.2d 124, 126 (5th Cir. 1968)). 304 United States v. Oxman, 740 F.2d 1298, 1307 (3d Cir. 1984). 305 See 4 Wayne R. LaFave et

phasis added). Courts have held that Brady obligations extend only to prosecutors, because the Supreme Court has not imposed this duty on others. See Villasana v. Wilhoit, 368 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir. 2004). w 4 See Brady, 373 U.S. at 88. w > 162 F.3d 937 (7th Cir. 1998). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_01