Epstein Secrets

Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 6th Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07/08/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley Edwards Haley's affidavit Joint W/P Priv. 05579-05581 08/24/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradl

9 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/2009 Adam Horowit

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716.26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

Mercedes Estrada Bradley Edwards Judge Marra's July 61" Order Joint W/P Priv. 05476-05494 07/08/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley Edwards Haley's affidavit Joint W/P Priv. 05579.05581 08/24/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradl

9 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards NPA from Marie Villafana Joint W/P Priv. 05546 08/03/2009 Adam Horowit

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716-26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

eriff Investigator Media rep (?) Media rep (?) -1- EFTA00600049 Michael Sanka Patrick Roberts Nesbitt Kirkendahl Jason Richards Dexter Lee Maria Villafana Mark Epstein Judge Stone Deborah Villegas Bart' Bekkadan A.J. Discala Alfredo Rodriguez Michael Szafranski Dominic Ponatchio Moto Ban Mon S

itt Kirkendahl Jason Richards Dexter Lee Maria Villafana Mark Epstein Judge Stone Deborah Villegas Bar

arry Yogel Alan Weinstein, investment broker FROM BRADLEY EDWARDS DEPO Maria Kelljian Beth Williamson Michael Fisten Dean Howell Paul Cassell Ken Jenne Bill Berger Richard Fandry Jane Muskrat Michelle Daryan Chislaine Maxwell Paralegal Paralegal Investigator Referred E.W. case against Epstei

ttorney's Office—regarding the subject of the lawsuit or Jeffrey Epstein? A. Same objection and instruction. Q. All right. Did you ever speak with Marie Villafana during the pendency of that litigation which is still pending today? SCAROLA: Are you asking whether such conversations occurred that were relevan

re. SCAROLA: Then the instruction remains the same. The objection remains the same. Q. So, even if, do you - even if you talked about it with Mrs. Villafana, even if your client Mr. Edwards spoke with Mrs. Villafana about a scheduling issue, it's your position that its what, work-product? A. SCAROLA: T

ion of Jeffrey Epstein? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege]. Id., at 201. Q. [D]id you ever authorize or direct Ken Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. 12. Co

Jeffrey Epstein? Id. at page 101-102; line 24-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 102; line?-8. Q: Did you ever speak with Marie Villafana during, during the pendency of that litigation which is still pending today? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, page 102-03; line 24-1.

dad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330I• 954.467.1223 EFTA00799406 Q: So, even if; do you — even if you talked about it with Mrs. Villafana, even if your client Mr. Edwards spoke with Mrs. Villafana about a scheduling issue, it's your position that that is what, work-product? Id. at pag

uld not respond on the basis of privilege. Id. at page 288; line 15-21. A: Privilege. Id. at page 288; line 22. Counsel for Epstein then discusses Ken Jenne: Q: Did Mr. Jenne, did you ever direct Mr. Jenne to do any investigation on the Epstein cases? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, at pa

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Judge, next we're at page 11. The subject matter turns to Mr. Edwards' communications with Maria Villafana, who is the United States attorney -- assistant United States attorney involved in the Epstein cases. Question: My question is only did you spea

- what specifically are the questions that you believe need to be answered? Discussions that Mr. Edwards may have had with respect to or with Ms. Villafana, the U.S. attorney, I don't know what that has to do with this particular case, other than to suggest that if in fact Mr. Edwards was pursuing th

tic) -- purpose of the conversation with this officer. No answer, yet he's listed on the witness list at this time. Then the conversation turns to Ken Jenne, former Sheriff who worked at RRA during the time in question. THE COURT: What page are you on? MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: I'm at the top of page 15. S

Jeffrey Epstein? Id. at page 101-102; line 24-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 102; line?-8. Q: Did you ever speak with Marie Villafana during, during the pendency of that litigation which is still pending today? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, page 102-03; line 24-1.

ction remains the same. The objection remains the same. Id. at page 103; line 14-16.4 Q: So, even if; do you — even if you talked about it with Mrs. Villafana, even if 'The objection is: "If that is information that you obtained in the course of your responsibilities in representation of any client I woul

uld not respond on the basis of privilege. Id. at page 288; line 15-21. A: Privilege. Id. at page 288; line 22. Counsel for Epstein then discusses Ken Jenne: Q: Did Mr. Jenne, did you ever direct Mr. Jenne to do any investigation on the Epstein cases? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, at pa

Well, let me ask you a broader question. 19 After you filed the lawsuit against the United 20 States of America, were you aware that Marie 21 Villafana or the United States Attorney's Office 22 represented the USA, correct? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. All right. Did you ever speak with Marie 25 Villaf

any area where 14 those files were located. I believe so. 15 Q. Okay. Well, during the time you were 16 there did an individual by the name of Ken Jenne 17 work there? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. Okay. Did an individual by the name of 20 Mike Fisten work for the firm -- 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. -- for RRA