Epstein Secrets

Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 22 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300 Miami. Florida 33132 A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney 500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar

t fl 10, 12, 19. 46. Admitted. 47. Denied. AUSA Villafana met with Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 and most of th

d language does not appear in Exhibit 4; it appears at DE361-5. 36. The government admits paragraph 36 but notes that Exhibit 2 is not an email to Humberto Ocariz; the referenced email appears at DE361-3. The second sentence of paragraph 36 is admitted. 37. Admitted. 38. The Government admits that on Septemb

Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 22 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33132 A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney 500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Eduardo I. Sanchez Assistant United States A

t fl 10, 12, 19. 46. Admitted. 47. Denied. AUSA Villafana met with Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 and most of th

d language does not appear in Exhibit 4; it appears at DE361-5. 36. The government admits paragraph 36 but notes that Exhibit 2 is not an email to Humberto Ocariz; the referenced email appears at DE361-3. The second sentence of paragraph 36 is admitted. 37. Admitted. 38. The Government admits that on Septemb

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USA

SDFL's "unilateral" decision is false. Before the SDFL decided to assign selection of the "attorney representative" to an independent third party, AUSA Marie Villafana had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he bad been recom

independent third party, AUSA Marie Villafana had already proposed an "attorney representative." She had proposed local products-liability lawyer, Humberto Ocariz, and claimed he bad been recommended by a "good friend in the Appellate Division." Ms. Villafana's account was misleading, as it omitted that this

ase at the Earliest Stage 4, In early November of 2006, Epstein’s lawyers had their initial contact with the newly assigned line federal prosecutor, A. Marie Villafana. Although it is extremely unusual for a First Assistant United States Attorney to participate in such a communication, FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman was prese

proval because her subpoena was not directed to “an office physically located within an attorney’s office.” See Tab 18, December 13, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana at 4n.1. This answer clearly suggests that Ms. Villafana had intentionally misled the Department officials about the items that her subpoena sought.”

tion in favor of the state. Although Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney’s Office had already reached a plea agreement, in August 2007, Mr. Sloman and AUSA Marie Villafana warned that they intended to prosecute Epstein federally unless his counsel (i.e., not the U.S. Attorney’s Office) sought more stringent conditions t