Epstein Secrets

had occurred with stated that she had not had was visibly upset throughout the interview. ith Invcgigation on 01/31/2008 nko 31£-MM-108062 by al West Palm Beach, Florida Date dictmed 01/31/2008 051 This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and i

said tat was the reason S had so much money and was able to support him. On 03/04/2011 'I'll'. contacted the United States Attorney's Office in West Palm Beacn, FL and expressed her willingness to speak further with investigators about her activities with EPSTEIN. indicated that EPSTEIN had instructed her

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked Dexter

possible public corruption or, at the least] miscarriage of justice. With regard to the logistics of opening the case file, the opening of files in West Palm Beach is relatively informal. In instances where an agent approaches line directly (either because it is duty matter or because the investigation is with

npersuaded by the letter and the presentation, but I agreed that I should carefully review transcripts of the recorded statements given to PBPD for Brady issues.15 Since witness credibility was clearly at the fore, I undertook efforts 14 The requested documents and items were never provided. 15 As th

conference call in October 2010, attorneys for the U.S. Attorney's Office mentioned that they believed that Epstein lived in Palm Beach, rather than West Palm Beach. At the conclusion of that conference call, victims counsel understood that Government counsel would be providing a comprehensive response to all of

withhold relevant information contrary to its position in court. In their motion (at pp. 5-9), the victims explained why fairness entitles them to "Brady" information (i.e., information contradicting the Government's position) no less than criminal defendants. In response, the Government does not eve

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady' Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would p

ns an a was the reason had so much money and was able to him. at said' support On 03/04/2011 contacted the United States Attorney's Office in West Palm Beac , FL and expressed her willingness to s eak further with investigators about her activities with EPSTEIN. indicated that EPSTEIN had instructed her

s representing criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked and t

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

e attorneys representing criminals, the Office would promptly turn over all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under Brady. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and related decisions. Victims' counsel asked the Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would p

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK This subpoena is issued upon application DATE: August 2, 2006 r of Assistant U.S. Attorney Australian 500 So Avenue, Suue West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6235 Tel: Fax: •.I not app Ca e, alter none." Case No.T084P07-36*V-MARRA RP036001)59 EFTA00228319 United States District Court SOU

er exceeded the scope of the warrant or diverged from the warrant's permissible search strategy; raise allegations that the government violated its Brady obligations; challenge an expert's credentials or methodology; or generally sow doubt and confusion. Forensics audit trails can be quite lengthy, an

s well as in several supervisory positions in the SDFL. By mid- 2006, he had returned to his position as the Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division in West Palm Beach (head of the West Palm Beach branch office), after serving as the interim iallifiLof the Public Integrity Section at DOJ at the request of AAG Fishe

ir statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming person! injury. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the tbnn of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

ssible public corruption or, at the least, a miscarriage of justice. With regard to the logistics of opening the case file, the opening of files in West Palm Beach is relatively informal. In instances where an agent approaches a line AUSA directly (either because it is a duty matter or because the investigation

npersuaded by the letter and the presentation, but I agreed that I should carefully review transcripts of the recorded statements given to PBPD for Brady issues." Since witness credibility was clearly at the fore, I undertook efforts " The requested documents and items were never provided. 15 As the