Epstein Secrets

Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beac FL 33401-5012 Fax: Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 4 EFTA00231323 RECYCLED PAPER TO REORDER CALA, 9M-846-9399 EFTA00231324 IN THE CIR

torney's Office — Southern District, 500 S. Australian Avenue, , West Palm Beach, FL 33401, JUDITH STEVENSON AREO, ESQ., State Attorney's Office — West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQ., and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas

llate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.3100). [4.I Child Custody 76D fe=i903 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

Office — Southern District, 500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, JUDITH STEVENSON AREO, ESQ., State Attorney's Office — West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQ., and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas

ppellate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. [4] Child Custody 76D C ,903 76D Child Custody 76DXUI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

ileTaixt U.S. Mail to; R. Ainstneter Acosta; United StatesAtIhnt&s Oiglet ;•Soulhorn • !I li. :' • i District; SQ0 S.Austttillati Ave., Ste. 400, West Palen Beach, FL 3,1419 . 11.fiutat . • . .. • r : • • * nit • • 1 ' ;':y i i !I i Illeitaa WiteAtiliffe,IEsq,i, and Judith Stevenson Arco, Rs.q? Stat4!

llate proceeding. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. (4] Child Custody 76D sE :, 903 76D Child Custody 76DXHI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211kI9.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody