Epstein Secrets

his case files were being shown to outside investors. -4- POWIJI Man BURNETT, P.A. • PHILLIPS POINT • WEST 'HAVER. SUITS 901.77? Sotrm FRAMER DRIVE, WEST PALM BRACH, FLORIDA 33401 (561) 802.9044 EFTA00206612 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 5 of 10 Jane Doe v. Jeffre

Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 'ICA A I ' A FoWLER WHITE BURNETT, PA. • PHILLIEs Poiwr • WEST TOWER, SUITE 901.777 SOUTH HAGLER DRIVE, WEST PALM BEAcif , ELoluDA 33401 • (561) 802.9044 EFTA00206617 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 10 of 10 Jane Doe v. Je

okrOos order USDC Dor r lipstelaiLA(9/2/10-1539) -10- FOWLER WHIZ IS BURN OTT, P.A. • PHILLIPS POINT - HUT TUMOR, SUITE 901, 777 SOUTH HAGLER INURE, WEST PALM UEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802.9044 EFTA00206618

tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of

his case files were being shown to outside investors. -4- POWIJI Man BURNETT, P.A. • PHILLIPS POINT • WEST 'HAVER. SUITS 901.77? Sotrm FRAMER DRIVE, WEST PALM BRACH, FLORIDA 33401 (561) 802.9044 EFTA00213905 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 5 of 10 Jane Doe v. Jeffre

tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of

his case files were being shown to outside investors. -4- POWIJI Man BURNETT, P.A. • PHILLIPS POINT • WEST 'HAVER. SUITS 901.77? Sotrm FRAMER DRIVE, WEST PALM BRACH, FLORIDA 33401 (561) 802.9044 EFTA00235289 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 5 of 10 Jane Doe v. Jeffre

tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

t Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 30 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach (sic), Florida, and elsewhere. Epstein performed repeated lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts on them, including (but not limited to) masturbation, to

propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p