Epstein Secrets

he State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; she was living in Orlando at the time; and she was never served or told about the grand jury presentation. JD#9 admittedly has used drugs since bec

ing, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age in the commission of a drug offense). In United States. Taylor, 239 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001), the Ninth Circuit addressed a defendant's assertion that knowledge of minority is required to convict him of transporting a minor for purposes of prostitution. The N

illo, wherein he indicated that after his release from the Palm Beach County Jail he intends to reside permanently at his home at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida, and he plans to work in West Palm Beach, Florida as well. 6. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstei

F. App'x 337, 346 (6th Cir. 2002) ("Here, the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize.")). In Woodruff, the Ninth Circuit affirmed its prior holding that courts "are not commissioned to run around getting apologies" and reasoned that the law is not usually concerned wi

illo, wherein he indicated that after his release from the Palm Beach County Jail he intends to reside permanently at his home at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida, and he plans to work in West Palm Beach, Florida as well. 6. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstei

F. App'x 337, 346 (6th Cir. 2002) ("Here, the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize.")). In Woodruff, the Ninth Circuit affirmed its prior holding that courts "are not commissioned to run around getting apologies" and reasoned that the law is not usually concerned wi

illo, wherein he indicated that after his release from the Palm Beach County Jail he intends to reside permanently at his home at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida, and he plans to work in West Palm Beach, Florida as well. 6. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstei

F. App'x 337, 346 (6th Cir. 2002) ("Here, the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize.")). In Woodruff, the Ninth Circuit affirmed its prior holding that courts "are not commissioned to run around getting apologies" and reasoned that the law is not usually concerned wi

onse to the Motion to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross Motion to Compel. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007: at West Palm Beach, Florida. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: William L. Riches, Esutti c Roy Black. Esquire EFTA00179170 (Rev. 06/2005)5^Iled

t reasonableness scrutiny"). In the context of the seizure for off-site review of intermingled computerized evidence pursuant to a search warrant, the Ninth Circuit recently stated: In the case of a lawful and reasonable seizure of intermingled computer records for off- site review, . . . our precedents and the

RRA P-000999 EFTA00228379 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40', West Palen Beach. FL 33401 (361)8104711 August 15, 2007 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-001000 EFTA00228380 Sincerely, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA STATES ATTO Y By:

-client privileged material Law enforcement sensitive In addition, in United States Hill, No. 05-50219, 2006 WL 2328721 (9th Cir. Aug. 11, 2006), the Ninth Circuit addressed narrow versus broad forensic searches when it rejected an argument that law enforcement should have conducted a narrow, on-site search. T

illo, wherein he indicated that after his release from the Palm Beach County Jail he intends to reside permanently at his home at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Florida, and he plans to work in West Palm Beach, Florida as well. 6. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstei

F. App'x 337, 346 (6th Cir. 2002) ("Here, the district court exceeded its equitable power when it ordered [defendant] to apologize.")). In Woodruff, the Ninth Circuit affirmed its prior holding that courts "are not commissioned to run around getting apologies" and reasoned that the law is not usually concerned wi

g, or coercing a person under eighteen years of age in the commission of a drug offense). In United States v. Taylor, 239 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001), the Ninth Circuit addressed a defendant's assertion that knowledge of minority is required to convict him of transporting a minor for purposes of prostitution. The N

he State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#6 was to testify in West Palm Beach; she was living in Orlando at the time; and she was never served or told about the grand jury presentation. JD#6 admittedly has used drugs since bec