Epstein Secrets

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, M.

arguments that the victims had not seen before in the three-and-a-half years that this case has been litigated. The victims then filed under seal a Motion for Court to Deny the Motion to Dismiss Based on Existing Pleadings or, at a Minimum, Allow Leave to File a Sur-Reply. That motion explained that the Governm

ppropriate Motion to Jnalism; review Motion re Adverse 21 Exhibits; follow insurance policy; .idyke and J. 'rinse 03/28/18 RJG D .lition to Farmer 2.30 908.50 J. der to show cause - C ceding 03/28/18 PVD (N . , feting Oral 2.00 0.00 A. it of Certiorari re R .s re same EFTA0079913

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M

se to summary of damages filed by B. Edwards and Farmer Jaffe 07/02/18 SJL Follow up on outstanding dra

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

se to summary of damages filed by B. Edwards and Farmer Jaffe 07/02/18 SJL Follow up on outstanding dra

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr