arguments that the victims had not seen before in the three-and-a-half years that this case has been litigated. The victims then filed under seal a Motion for Court to Deny the Motion to Dismiss Based on Existing Pleadings or, at a Minimum, Allow Leave to File a Sur-Reply. That motion explained that the Governm

s Permission to Alter Trial Evidence by Replacing Names with Initials of Edwards' Three Clients on Trial Exhibits [D.E. 1240] 15 3/5/18 Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Ma

ndix in Support of Response in Opposition to Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and D.E. 1252, Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for 2 EFTA00793756 Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and

from Trial Docket in Order to Comply With the Mandate Set Forth in Rule 1.440; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials; work on Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special M

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

e J. Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike All Exhibits and Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials, and Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, for purposes of drafting Sworn Declaration of Fact of Scott J. Link, as part of Bankr

F HIS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS, ETC. As supplemental authority in support of his Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Non- Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for In Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability