Epstein Secrets

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to respond to the Government's Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The Court should deny the motion. Because the Government has filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the victims' pleadings are facially deficient

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, UT \Ill A Tile UTOTAO 0. T

Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to respond to the Government's Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The Court should deny the motion. Because the Government has filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the victims' pleadings are facially deficient

thern District of Florida Bradley Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

the Court should grant the United States' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decision on the United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and, similarly, deny the Petitioners' Protective Motion to Compel. In both their Response to the Motion to Stay Discovery and their Motion to Compel

thern District of Florida Bradley Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

the Court should grant the United States' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the Court's decision on the United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and, similarly, deny the Petitioners' Protective Motion to Compel. In both their Response to the Motion to Stay Discovery and their Motion to Compel