Epstein Secrets

er. The recently disbanded South Florida firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL broug

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Editing by Adam LoBelia. EFTA00805054

s contained on the discs with Bates numbers added, and will provide a set of copied, stamped documents to the Special Master and an identical set to Farmer, who will use same to create its privilege log . . . Fowler White will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it

v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit") to the RRA trustee, were 1 EFTA00808140 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6382 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 7 to be print

stein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client." The bankruptcy court permitted Fowler White access to the electronic data because the firm could make the copies and

he U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800)COCX MB AG, in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida. —Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Jill Coffey. View commen

id. The recently disbanded South Florida firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL had s

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Nathan Hale. Editing by Edrienne Su. Update: This story has

nications from Farmer Jaffe in connection with claims he brought against Edwards, Rothstein and a victim client, according to the sanctions motion. Farmer )affe asked that Epstein bear the costs of copying and organizing the documents. That could be performed without reading them, but Farmer Jaffe stil

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, In the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Bruce Goldman. AI Content 6 200

BN 118247 Edwards Pottinger LLC 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 4 EFTA00795942 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6383 Filed 05/14/18 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVI

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be deliv

tein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client." [DE 1194]. Remarkably, in clear and intentional defiance of this Court's order, Fanner Jaffe recently discovered that

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("

www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards,

leged that Rothstein had engaged in a fraud against him. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (Cir. Ct. of the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, FL). 24. and Edwards answered the complaint, denying all allegations against them and

t in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this day of November, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman PL Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Aueroury uotaneriter K weirs, r., FOWLER WHITE BURNER, PA -8- EFTA0023

thout requesting them first and giving Epstein the opportunity to object and a Court to rule. See [D.E. 118], Epstein v. Edwards, 502009CA40800XXXX MB AG, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. At this point there is no reason for Mr. Epstein to become involved in the case where Edwar

hearing has been scheduled by Special Master Carney for April 6, 2011 relating to the sufficiency of the privilege log as presently prepared by the Farmer, Jaffe firm with regard to 1500 or more Epstein related documents. Special Master Carney will perform an in camera inspection of the documents at i

18/11 Page 3 of 5 Scott Rothstein, individually, Bradley J. Edwards, individually and L.M., individually, bearing case number 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG. The subpoena was directed to the Trustee in this case as the Trustee had possession of the documents at issue. 4. On October 13, 2010, the Razorb