Epstein Secrets

Submitted, AI sae, p. Samna Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

Submitted, AI sae, p. Samna Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

bmitted, AI Sada/ 9 E&04414 Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, ■.

equires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (E. Fla. 2012). If the evidence offered by the nonmoving party is 17 EFTA00597334 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 41

tted, Is/ Flaky 9. Sdeatela Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FIS1'OS & LEHRMAN, P.

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts " 3 See Exhibit 88. IM Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18