Epstein Secrets

d before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I became involved in the case. Mr. Farmer is representing the child in OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305) 358-8875 EFTA00731384 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1

ause if the trustee believed that -- THE COURT: There's no litigation pending. MR. FARMER: That we -- Edwards and LM have not been sued -- I mean, Lichtman's been sued, Adler. People have been brought in by the trustee because they've found evidence that they believe constitutes some wrongful conduct,

nts are held by the trustee now, and so Mr. Stettin was concerned that there may be some privilege issues on those documents, and as a result, Mr. Lichtman and the attorneys came forward before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I beca

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

ilege and do a 11 against Brad Edwards individually, and it was 12 privilege log. 12 against one of the claimants, 12A individually. 13 Now, Mr. Farmer's office on behalf of 13 '11W COURT: So It's not against the debtor 14 LM wants to do that We don't think Mars 14 estate. 15 appropriate. We thi

, your Honor, may it 4 those, et cetera, our client has already offered 4 please the Court Again, Gary Fanner on behalfof 5 to the trustee, to Mr. Lichtman, we will pay for 5 the interested party, LM, also on behalf of 6 it, whether ifs a special master or whether it's 6 Brad Edwards and I'm sorry, y

purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes, I have seen this. Q Going to

f communications on the next page purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes

Fax: Jane Doe No. 7 Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe Consol Plaintiff C.M.A. Consol Plaintiff Adam D. Horowitz LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Farmer. Jaffe. Weissina, Edwards, Fistos. Lehrman. P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 A Fax: Jeffrey Marc Herman LEAD AT

2009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

Attorneys Bradley James Edwards [COR LD NTC] Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos 8. Lehrman PL 425

009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as