Epstein Secrets

22(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 69 EFTA00224203 VCOURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE itn N.D. Tex. U.S. I Jackson, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6168/N.D. Tex. 2002); see U.S. I Jackson, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 539 (N.D. Tex. 2002) for details of facts; and U.S. I. Jackson

); underlying case U.S. I Gawk, Case No. 5- 05-MJ-341 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Telephone Mayor solicited

ial denied. No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 77 EFTA00224211 COURT aCAS -. .. . lit FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme I U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicating

F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA01729485 U.S. v. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi,

FTA01729558 COURT ' - ‘.,-: ' CAS ,7,-...k.. „ .1y- " • .., • _%.-L,..,--- • :.FAOIL .2 •MO A, :.1trCFStc 1.4,11,O4 • , "..; N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin

F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi,

d. 2422(6); 2423; 1956 No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 74 EFTA00079487 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin