Epstein Secrets

12 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 janeso@bellsouthriei Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submi By: ROBERT CRITTON,112., ESQ. Flovida No. 224162 MICHAEL J. ME, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 =Was :14mm BURMAN, CRITTON, LIJItER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach,

REBY CERTIFY that a truc copy of the foregoing wes hand-delivered to die Clerk of the Court as required Dy the Local Ru/es of the South= District of Floride and eleceonically =Wied to all enquise; of record idendfied on the following Service List on this JJig day of Scptembes, 2009. Certifient of Servi

561.832-7137 F isidrogarcia@bellsouthoet Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358.2382 riosefsbetaloodhurstcom Isegellgyodhurstcom Counsel for P

ation lilt suit pursuant to IX O.S.C. it 2255. Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction ill' the 11.5. District Coun her the StHAIRTI1 District of Plurida over his person and'or Ow subject mailer, and Epstein will not contest that the identified victims arc persons who, while minors, were victims of vi

ependent Special Master to select attorneys to represent you. Those attorneys are Aaron Podhurst and Robert ("Bob") Josefsberg with the law firm of Podhurst Orseck, ■. They can be reached at (305) 358-2800. I anticipate that someone from their law firm will be contacting you shortly. I must also advise you that

ger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submitted By: ROBERT D. ITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida B MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florid a BURMAN, CRITTON, arrrmR & COLEMAN (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00212862

ntified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on thiV ay of 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully sub

Location ol MM froluday Nam dBeetwosel - 1talbn ol Mom 12 4 Ipso elfrairost Hemp. &Waft 4 . , j 1-c....! lie frVii y ill (.4,) CA, rit" I f, FL & me Ansi Tone of Aims, I I I Elocalnp Dais boalic Ilene lata DON Jail Timis _... Localiom of *NOS m....s i s i l *me (LW. Pest WOW c.. P

orida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: September 15, 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Robert Josefsberg, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. City National Bank Building 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Re: Representation of Victims of Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. J

response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule “is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the conseque

against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell

the litigation of his abuse of process claim against Edwards. For support, he relies primarily on the decision of Wolfe v. Foreman, 2013 WL 3724763 (Fla. 3d DCA July 17, 2013), wherein the Third District found that the litigation privilege barred both an abuse of process claim and a malicious prosecut

aints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one aml a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell