Epstein Secrets

Y EPS7inl, DelmsSeat. OCMIllae or sodneecley, Thievery 20, 2000 2:00 p.m. 400 p.p. Palo Nina County rOvetimin 2O5 IfOtt1 Dixie Met lath bona, Florid. 11411 cop'! Imported Vy: Judith 1. Connor. ITS Votary Publte. Stlit• of Florida Censor a ASSOC.:Stag Report frog and Tronsealption ?tom - 541.

he pre than .ply 13 to do it, inane it ware ism you all now an 14 *boot It than 1 -- but L'S happy to got alfl aaaaaa 15 from At. liners. Judge Stern, everybody *toe teboet 16 Pot barlignoll with this hearing today. POPP 17 cow vedy tittle *bout tt. but ay reptooriktiOno le as• what they ate

ts JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, and SARAH KELLEN, and state as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Vonuc I. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the Stale of Florida. She is a minor under the age of I 8 years. 2. Jane Doe'S Mother brings this action as parent and natural guardian of Jane Doe. 3. This Complaint

han happy 13 to do it, because it sounds like you all know more 14 about it than I -- but I'm happy to get affidavits 15 from Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern, everybody else about 16 what happened with this hearing today, because 17 know very little about it. But my representations 18 are what they a

ch, owned by Donald Trump. Fostein joinec them on four other breaks over the year, including a beach oolicay in Pruket. Thailand, smother holiday in Plarida ane twe ocessions in Britain. The fist wis June engagement ot Windsor Case lo celebrate the Queen's birthday, Lhe second 3 weekend house perly sl Sa

ng statement regarding resolution of the case styled Bradley Edwards, et al. v. Alan M. Dershowitz, Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Cir. Ct., Broward Cnty., Fla.). STATEMENT OF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ | am pleased that the litigation has concluded and | am gratified by the Joint Statement issued today by Jeffrey

ying amendment where “addition of more plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”’); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit