Epstein Secrets

much less for the purpose of engaging in "illicit sexual conduct." To the contrary, the prospect that Mr. Epstein might engage in sexual activity in Florid was not the dominant motive—or even a significant motive—for his travel. See Mortensen I United EFTA00225877 • Page 32 Federal prosecutors have

sentence does not change the fact that the sentence was available to the State and rejected in its discretion. Therefore, Petite's presumption that the State of Florida's prior prosecution of Mr. Epstein has vindicated the federal interest cannot be said to have been overcome. • • Second, the State's proposed plea

"substantially enhanced" forms of punishment in order to vindicate federal interests, and given that the federal government does not itself require "Johns" to register as federal sex offenders, it is hard to see how State-law sex-offender registration can fairly be characterized as necessary to vindic

greement-und-has-been-sentetteedrIthe-United-Stutes-funlierogreestontakoo-motion with-the-United-States-Distriet-Court-for-the-Setitheni-Distriet-of-Flerida-for-the-appointmerit-of-a guenfitin-ad-Igeat-kw-the-identified-vietipts-andikedofetukintis-eounsel-marcontriemite-identiried vientwAhrough-that-git

ireired-by-Seetion-3742-tooppeol-any-sentettee-ititposedritieloalingeny-restitution-ortiorror tounnealabeinannepin-wItiehalie-seittetwe-was-imposed, Johns the-semeneeeKeeedsahemtiannum permitted-by-suititterThe-defendam-funlieevoluntorityondoxpressly-waiveraaheanweimumement penttitted-by-fedenil-lal-t

he pertinent federal statutes, and respectfully request that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General end federal involvement in this matter so that the State of Florida may resolve this case appropriately. Summary of the Facts Mr. Epstein has maintained a home in Palm Beach, Florida for the past 20 years. While the

Epstein is prepared to plead guilty and accept a sentence for that offense—a sentence that, notably, is far more severe than that meted out to other “Johns” convicted of violating Florida’s solicitation laws for cases in which sexual activity was alleged. Though CEOS points out its admirable goal of “pr

creates a substantive right which prevents prosecution and conviction of an individual after the statute has run.” See State v. King, 282 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 1973); Tucker v. State, 417 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1982) (citing cases). Given the one-year statute of limitations, any conduct that might amou