Epstein Secrets

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

t for information on previous investigations of Mr. Epstein, and for legal guidance on various aspects of the case (e.g., OEO, CEOS, SEC, SDNY, and AFMLS); along with the FBI agents and the FBI Victim-Witness Coordinator, I had direct contact with victims via interviews, meetings, and consultations re

internal as I tried to deal professionally with opposing counsel. In the midst of all of the post-NPA back-and-forth with Epstein, was the Jane Doe. United States litigation.4 Despite the Office's request to be recused from the case, the Justice Department decided that there was no conflict of interest and I w

t for information on previous investigations of Mr. Epstein, and for legal guidance on various aspects of the case (e.g., OEO, CEOS, SEC, SDNY, and AFMLS); along with the FBI agents and the FBI Victim-Witness Coordinator, I had direct contact with victims via interviews, meetings, and consultations re

nt is made in the shortest time in which full payment can reasonably be made. (18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(2)) Payment plans should not limit the ability of the United States or the victim to immediately and fully enforce the restitution obligation using all available remedies authorized by law. G. Enforcement of Restitu

seq.) Petitions for Remission are submitted by each individual victim to the Department of Justice's Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS). This option is particularly useful when there are victims of offenses that underlie civil forfeitures but no companion criminal case and, thus, n