Epstein Secrets

e any matter occurring before the grand jury except in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3). Notification of this disclosure will be provided to the United States District Court who empaneled the federal grand jury in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(B). Ft 7. The United States respectfully requests th

ted States Attorney, and moves this Court, on behalf of the federal grand jury, for the production of transcripts of any and all proceedings before the State Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/o including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any

victim. The Fourth Circuit soundly rejected the argument, citing the other circuits reaching the same conclusion. Jones, 471 F.3d at 538-39 (citing United States I. Griffith, 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States, Taylor, 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States I Scisum, 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-

dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

t the victim is a minor, regardless of what the victim says or how the victim appears. Id. (emphasis added; additional internal citations omitted). Cl United States v. Wild, 143 7 EFTA02857530 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the parties agreed that, to prove a violation of § 2423(a), the United States h

05, even though Jane Doe #2 never went to EPSTEIN's house because at the time of his travel, EPSTEIN intended for Jane Doe #2 to come to the house. See United States v. Han, 230 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2000) (defendant could be convicted of violating Section 2423(b) even though no sexual activity occurred and "minor"

dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#6 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

s chapter, shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed and irrespective of any provision of State law, that such person shall forfeit to the United States—(1) such person's interest in any property, real or personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such v

edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

s chapter, shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed and irrespective of any provision of State law, that such person shall forfeit to the United States—(1) such person's interest in any property, real or personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such v

edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#8 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s