3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
ests that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida defer such prosecution"). Thus, the 8 EFTA00066001 NPA's references to the "United States" demonstrate a definitional intent not to limit such provisions to the USAO-SDFL. The NPA begins with several factual recitals. After noting certai
e government's position. The co-conspirator immunity provision does not prohibit merely prosecutions by the USAO for the SDFL ("USAO-SDFL"), but by "the United States." This broad prohibition was intentional, as demonstrated by the express references elsewhere in the NPA to the United States Attorney and/or the US
f Hannover, PLC, 826 F. App'x 822 (I I th Cir. 2020) 21, 27 Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971) 12 Subaru Distribs. Corp. v. Subaru of Am., Inc., 425 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2005) 15 EFTA00065991 United States v. Aleman, 286 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2002) United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d C
ests that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida defer such prosecution"). Thus, the 8 EFTA00099364 NPA's references to the "United States" demonstrate I definitional intent not to limit such provisions to the USAO-SDFL. The NPA begins with several factual recitals. After noting certai
e government's position. The co-conspirator immunity provision does not prohibit merely prosecutions by the USAO for the SDFL ("USAO-SDFL"), but by "the United States." This broad prohibition was intentional, as demonstrated by the express references elsewhere in the NPA to the United States Attorney and/or the US
f Hannover, PLC, 826 F. App'x 822 (I I th Cir. 2020) 21, 27 Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971) 12 Subaru Distribs. Corp. v. Subaru of Am., Inc., 425 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2005) 15 EFTA00099354 United States v. Aleman, 286 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2002) United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d C
ith the "expected" rates based upon the proportional availability of black females in the labor pool. Id. We endorsed a similar use of proxy data in United States v. County of Fairfax, involving a county government that had destroyed three years of employment applications. 629 F.2d at 940. To analyze hiring du
at 764; see also Smith, 84 F.3d at 676; accord Rodriguez v. Nat'l City Bank, 726 F.3d 372, 384-85 (3d Cir. 2013); Morgan v. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc., 380 F.3d 459, 468 (8th Cir. 2OO4); Munoz v. Orr, 200 F.3d 291, 301 (5th Cir. 2000); Sheehan v. Daily Racing Form, Inc., 104 For internal use only
Entities connected to both United States and Am., Inc.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONCourtney Wild
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON
Santa Fe
LOCATIONPerez
PERSON