Epstein Secrets

) 275 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioners' Reassertion of Objections to Government's Assertions of Privileges by United S f America. Responses due by 11/24/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)() (Entered: 11/07/2014) 276 ORDER granting 275 Motion for Extension of Ti

ompliance re 330 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Seal (dj) (Entered: 07/06/2015) 332 NOTICE of Compliance (Partial) by United Stat f Am ri r 0 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Seal ( ) (Entered: 07/20/2015) 333 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Ti

e 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the . . A rney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence filed by United States of America. ( (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 60 RESPONSE in Opposition re 51 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Use Correspondenc

tioners' Motion for Depositions of Government Witnesses re 344 MOTION Motion for Depositions of Government ( ) (Entered: 01/04/2016) Witnesses by United Sta f America. Responses due by 1/22/2016 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) 350 ENDORSED ORDER granting 349 Motion for Extension of Time Re: 34

endant's MOTION for Extension of Time to file Declaration of United States Attorney in Support of Deliberative Process Privilege by United States of Am rica. Responses due by 9/30/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Entered: 09/13/2013) ENDORSED ORDER granting 236 Motion for Extension of Ti

12/06/2012 12/07/2012 12/10/2012 181 12/21/2012 182 166 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages to Respond to Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene by Roy Black by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Edwards, Bradley) Modified Text on 4/20/2012 (Is). (Entered: 04/19/

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

1 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00225435 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 7/17/2007 Affidavit of Roy Black, Esq., in Support of Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Incorporated Memorandum of Law 7/18/2007 Andrew Laurie and Matt Menchel

unications from disclosure to third parties outside the negotiation process. 3. Whether this Court has jurisdiction of this appeal under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918). EFTA00209671 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 16 of 75 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND STATEMENT OF FACTS In Septembe

tomary practices of the defense and prosecution function, entitled to assume would remain confidential and would not be disclosed to third parties. See United States v. Deloitte UP, 610 F.3d 129, 141 (D.C.Cir. 2010)(court "examine[s] whether the disclosing party had a reasonable basis for believing that the reci

2, 2013, intervenors/appellants' Response to Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal, filed with this Court on July 12, 2013, and Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Non-Party interlocutory Appeal, filed with this Court on July 16, 2013. That motion remains pending before the Court. 45 EFTA00209715

ator Feinstein)(explaining that the right to confer was "intended to be expansive," applying to "any critical state or disposition of the case") and United States v. Heaton, 458 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (D. Utah 2006)(government motion to dismiss charge of using facility of interstate commerce to entice minors to enga

ted States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 01/26/2012) 01/26/2012 .1.44 RESPONSE in Opposition re_12$ Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by United States of America. (Sanchez, Eduardo) (Entered: 01/26/2012) 01/27/2012 145 ENDOR ingitl Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge on 1/27/2012. (ir)

.1Q1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Unopposed Moton for Five Extra Pages to Respond to Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene by roy Black, et al. by Jane Doe. (Attachments: CI. Text of Proposed OrderXEdwards, Bradley) (Entered: 10/10/2011) 10110)2011 101 RES

mail chain from Jeff Sloman to Andrew Oosterbaan, Marie Villafana, and Alex Acosta regarding Epstein meeting 8/ 7/ 200- Reply of Jeffrey Epstein to United States' Response to His Motion to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel and Sealed Document Tracking Form 8/8/2007 Andre

1 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00224950 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 7/17/2007 Affidavit of Roy Black, Esq., in Support of Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Incorporated Memorandum of Law 7/18/2007 Andrew Lourie and Matt Menchel

uash Grand Jury Subpoenas," "Affidavit of Roy Black, Esq. in Support of Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas," "United States' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas, " Declaration of Joseph Recarey (in support of United States'

list for indictment preparation); 19 ("Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas," "Affidavit of Roy Black, Esq. in Support of Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas," "United States' Response to Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash