Epstein Secrets

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

A. Marie viihfaria Jay Lefkowitz requesting draft to include 403 in lieu of 1512 .1() 9/14/2007 A. Marie Villafatia, A. Acosta , R. Garcia, A. Lowrie, K. Atkinson, S. Ball J. Sloman Email re finalizing documents 46 Privileged Confidential Page 15 of 51 Contains 6(e) Material EFTA00225442

17), it believes that that "there are two relevant facts which will permit the Court to resolve the legal issue: (1) there are no criminal cases in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, filed against Jeffrey Epstein; and (2) Epstein entered pleas of guilty to in Florida State Court on Ju

tes shall file a response within two weeks of the victims' brief; and (3) The victims shall then file, if they so choose, a reply within one week of the United States' response. The Court shall then hold argument on the issue, if it believes argument would be helpful, and then enter a ruling on whether the CVRA ex

ding when to use 'a' versus 'the' and other minutiae. When you and I could not reach agreement, you repeatedly went over my head, involving Messrs. Lowrie, Menchel, and Acosta in the negotiations at various times." U.S. Attorney's Correspondence at 269. The letter also stated: "Three victims were no

fthe individualsreferred to in paragraph (7), supra, elects to file suit Enna= to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction or the United Stales Zoos EFTA00213815 12/04/07 TUE 16:48 FAX 305 530 6440 Eniarriva OFFICE District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Florida over his person and/o

ns. The Section 2255 provision issue was first discussed at a July 31, 2007, roccjm• between FAUIIIM, Criminal Chief Menthol, West Palm Beach Chief Lowrie. AUSAM I and two FBI agents wbo wet with Roy Black, Gerald Lcfcourt, and LillyAnn Sanchez On that date the prosecutors presented a written, row-bul

mail chain from Jeff Sloman to Andrew Oosterbaan, Marie Villafana, and Alex Acosta regarding Epstein meeting 8/ 7/ 200- Reply of Jeffrey Epstein to United States' Response to His Motion to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel and Sealed Document Tracking Form 8/8/2007 Andre

ospital (return date 9/22/06) 9/21/2006 Subpoena to The Dalton School (return date 9/29/09) 9/26/2006 Acosta, Mulvihill, Sloman, Nom, Waters , Lowrie ' Stefin, Atkinson, Garcia, Brown, Boscovich, Martinez Villafana Memo regarding changes to Child Exploration Statutes in Tide 18 10/19/2006 S