Epstein Secrets

Michael C. Miller Steptoe STEPTOE a JOHNSON LLP 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NV 10036 www.steptoe.com August 9, 2018 BY E-MAIL Mr. Jeffrey E. Epstein do Mr. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 575 L

ance with Data Protection Legislation. Certain categories of personal data may be transferred between Steptoe's offices in the EU and its offices in the United States and China in conformity with Data Protection Legislation, including, where applicable, any "adequacy decision" adopted by the European Commission, o

e work for a period of six months and there are no ongoing appeals proceedings or intellectual property maintenance obligations. In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct, Steptoe will continue to protect the confidentiality of Client's information after the engagement has ended. Either Steptoe or the Client may term

Circuit has instructed that the district courts must make substantial findings before sealing records in criminal cases before it. For instance, in United States'. Ochoa-Vasque, 428 F.3d 1015 (11ih Cir. 2005), the Eleventh Circuit reversed an order from this Court that had sealed pleadings in a criminal case,

s from Epstein's defense attorneys discussing the case as well. The statements made by both victims counsel and defense counsel are proper, because the Rules of Professional Conduct plainly allow discussion with the media about "information contained in a public record." ABA R. Prof. Conduct 3.6(a)(2). Epstein also complains ab

agreement in a manner that ensured that the government obtained restitution, the DOJ attorneys violated the fundamental duty to provide the client (the United States) with competent representation. Despite this violation, OPR concluded that the DOJ attorneys did not commit professional misconduct or exercise poor

the DOJ attorney made an excusable mistake. 21. Contact with a Represented Person. A district court ruled that a DOJ attorney violated Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct by allowing the defendant to testify before a grand jury without first obtaining the defendant's counsel's consent. Interpreting Rule 4.2, the cour