Epstein Secrets

te commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(1), with minor females, in violation of Title 18, United States Cod; Section 2423(b); all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(e); (3) using a facility or means of interstate or foreign commer

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that t

how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re

nd date a copy of this letter in the space provided below as an acknowledgment that you have received, read, EFTA00206895 Re: Jane Does #1 and #2 I. United States Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM November 2, 2010 Page -4- Privileged Communication and agree to comply with the preservation instructions contained i

how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re

of Litigation Hold Letter: I acknowledge that I have received and read the Litigation Hold letter dated November 2, 2010 regarding Jane Does #1 and Itli United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CP/-MARRA/Johnson and I have taken and agree to continue to take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the documents and da

how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to deny the[] [Jane Doe Petitioners] their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFLA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein "that [i]s highly re

to communications between the USAO-SDFIA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00189807 AUSA Deputy Chief Criminal ivision Re: Jane Does #1 and #2 I. United States Case No.: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM November 4, 20(0 Page -2- Privileged Communication "that (i)s highly relevant to the treatment of Jane Doe #1 and Jan

how Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to deny the() [Jane Doe Petitioners) their rights." DE 41 at 1. The Status Report alludes to communications between the USAO-SDFIA and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00189807 AUSA