4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
n to support petitioners' claims against Jeffrey Epstein for money damages, particularly with regard to obtaining documents and information from the United States Attorney. Once petitioners' damage claims against Mr. Epstein had been resolved, there would be no EFTA00206726 need for this auxiliary litigation
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
n to support petitioners' claims against Jeffrey Epstein for money damages, particularly with regard to obtaining documents and information from the United States Attorney. Once petitioners' damage claims against Mr. Epstein had been resolved, there would be no EFTA00206823 need for this auxiliary litigation
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
n to support petitioners' claims against Jeffrey Epstein for money damages, particularly with regard to obtaining documents and information from the United States Attorney. Once petitioners' damage claims against Mr. Epstein had been resolved, there would be no EFTA00206756 need for this auxiliary litigation
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
n to support petitioners' claims against Jeffrey Epstein for money damages, particularly with regard to obtaining documents and information from the United States Attorney. Once petitioners' damage claims against Mr. Epstein had been resolved, there would be no EFTA00235793 need for this auxiliary litigation
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
Entities connected to both United States and D.E. 38)(emphasis

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Cynthia Nixon
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
Ashcroft
PERSON
Hayes
PERSONThe Law Offices of
ORGANIZATIONBrad Edwards & Associates
ORGANIZATIONTwombly
PERSONOwens
PERSONthe Circuit Court
ORGANIZATIONBell Atlantic Corp.
ORGANIZATION
Ronald N. Boyce
PERSON