7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Defendant's canned objection represents a "blanket" refusal to answer questions in this civil case. See Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d
nformation is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed.Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evd. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provision of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)." C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion The substantive basis for Defendant's objection is a claim of pr
repared to name in an Indictment as victims of an offense by Mr. Epstein enumerated in 18. U.S.C. §2255. 2. All documents referring or relating go the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation, the operative agreement between
r, such information is privileged pursuant to Fed. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). EFTA00728988 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 10 of 24 Jane Doe No
ion concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Request No. 2. All documents referring or relating to the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation, the operative agreement between
r, such information is privileged pursuant to Fed. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). EFTA00222071 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57-3 Jane Doe No. 2'. Epstein Page 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/
effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Defendant's canned objection represents a "blanket" refusal to answer questions in this civil case. See Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d
nformation is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed.Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evd. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provision of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)." C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion The substantive basis for Defendant's objection is a claim of pr
he answers cannot possibly have such tendency to incriminate. gI at 488, 399. Recognizing the breadth and magnitude of this constitutional privilege, the United States Supreme Court in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence
r, such information is privileged pursuant to Fed. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). EFTA00222579 Cse 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 37 of 37 Jane Doe No.
HERM IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS: 3Cb NAME AND TITLE Cf SIGNER f lYPG OR PRAVG AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE 31a. UNITED STATES OF ALIERICA (WC:NATURE OF CONTRACT/AG OFFICER:, 31b. RNA OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER (TYPE OR PRAM 31c. DATE SIGNED 03/08/2021 STANDARD FORM 1049 (RE
001359 EFTA00156700 15JA5421P00000117 Page 9 of 19 Contractors using information systems that are subject to the data security requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) already are subject to the data security standards outlined below, and, therefore, only paragraphs (g), (h).
ion concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Request No. 2. All documents referring or relating to the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation, the operative agreement between
r, such information is privileged pursuant to Fed. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). EFTA00067433 Cse 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 37 of 37 Jane Doe No.
Entities connected to both United States and the Health Insurance Portability

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Lesley Groff
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON
Wilbur Ross
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Sarah Kellen
PERSONNadia Marcinkova
PERSON
Jean-Luc Brunel
PERSON