Epstein Secrets

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

Circuit has determined that this is not a civil case, but rather is "ancillary to a criminal investigation" and "a criminal action." Jane Doe No. 1 I. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005, 1006 (11th Cir. 2014). Despite that designation, the petitioners filed their case as a civil action and the district court has

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co... Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "jud

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

Palm Beach Post and The Palm Beach Daily News. case, but rather is "ancillary to a criminal investigation" and "a criminal action." Jane Doe No. 1 I. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005, 1006 (11th Cir. 2014). Despite that designation, the petitioners filed their case as a civil action and the district court has

d permission to intervene, the press then filed their motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,' and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co.. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "judi

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

tim cannot be required to participate in a sentencing or restitution hearing in order to obtain an order of restitution. 18 U.S.C. § 3664(g)(1). See United States v. Speakman, 594 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2010); United States v. Amara, 616 F. App'x 612 (4th Cir. 2015); United States v. Schmidt, 675 F.3d 1164 (8th

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co. v. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "ju