Epstein Secrets

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

Circuit has determined that this is not a civil case, but rather is "ancillary to a criminal investigation" and "a criminal action." Jane Doe No. 1 I. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005, 1006 (11th Cir. 2014). Despite that designation, the petitioners filed their case as a civil action and the district court has

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00211535 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

Palm Beach Post and The Palm Beach Daily News. case, but rather is "ancillary to a criminal investigation" and "a criminal action." Jane Doe No. 1 I. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1005, 1006 (11th Cir. 2014). Despite that designation, the petitioners filed their case as a civil action and the district court has

district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court. Doe No. 1, supra, 749 F.3d 999. Thus, Eps

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING INTERVENORS' RIGHTS TO OBSERVE AND PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE The Respondent, United States of America, b

tim cannot be required to participate in a sentencing or restitution hearing in order to obtain an order of restitution. 18 U.S.C. § 3664(g)(1). See United States v. Speakman, 594 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2010); United States v. Amara, 616 F. App'x 612 (4th Cir. 2015); United States v. Schmidt, 675 F.3d 1164 (8th

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00644730 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016