Epstein Secrets

Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. August 20, 2014 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida RE: Jane Does I and 21 United Stales Case No. : 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson Dear Mr. Ferrer: As you know, we have been in litigation for more than six years on a case under the Crime

ce. She was sexually trafficked and abused by Mr. Epstein (and others at the direction of Mr. Epstein) not only in this jurisdiction but throughout the United Slates and beyond. Unlike Jane Doe #3. Jane Doe #4 was included as a named victim in the NPA. There is no statute of limitations in bringing such claims,

or filing an action to enforce rights under the statute. Accordingly, her motion should be granted. Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 support the motion. The United States 'insert position xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I. CONCLUSION Jane Doe #3 should be allowed to join this action. A proposed order allowing her to join is attache

he rights of others nd then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser.. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00188866 Case 9:08-cv-807Ni Vam aKW 2WpeeerNar rai Rmiyocisstg21420n915 Page 4 of occasions between 2

n who may have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly referred to as the "United States") have conducted an investigation of Jeffrey Epstein regarding his solicitation of minor females in Palm Beach County to engage in prostitution. Mr

rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00725999 occasions between 2002 and 2005 in his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida. These sexual assau

is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "ev

rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, "'Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."

n who may have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly referred to as the "United States") have conducted an investigation of Jeffrey Epstein regarding his solicitation of minor females in Palm Beach County to engage in prostitution. Mr

rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). EFTA00081182 Case 9:08.cv_807agg3498mot 2rKali564rgerNeocp0F4lapiyocisstggy aig15 Page 4 of orrasions bet