Epstein Secrets

AL DECLARATION OF SERVICE' I declare under Statement of Service Executed on penalty of perjury Fees is true and eMoifr iZ n7 under the laws of the United Stales of America correct. that the foregoing information contained in the Return of Service and b b D TE bff‘ FL • _Pr 1. Mah-- Dr. sk no, Address of Server

Rule 45(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

ITIONAL INFORMATION As to who may serve a subpoena and the manner of its service see Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or Rule 45(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or

633 (E.D. Va. 2006). The Eleventh Circuit has not hesitated to support district courts that draw an adverse inference from silence. For example, in United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996), the district court drew an adverse inference when claimants to real property r

tions. Thus, there is a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein] ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). Th

er First Request for Admissions to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests said Defendant admit or deny the following facts, in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: DEFINITIONS The term "you" means and refers to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ADMISSIONS I. Your net worth is greater than $10 mill

tpawc Stn,. Rawl &AWN, &NNW Polio Serail IhO:rxii MrvnlnrNlu U.S. Coss, Guard US. awrteneta aSwe US Minlak SoNee LIS. Paul Stake US. Scan &Wu US &may Leal Ny Coseor SOPS 04<r JUDGMENT CORM CI Count Myna/ CO Cain CM1d/rolSenknet Cf Ws* Ndsreat DI Dim .IN &down Neweidunekirg MV Mud

OF AMERICA vs. ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. CRIMINAL COVER SHEET 1. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the United States Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes X No 2. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the United St

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As to who may serve a subpoena and the mama of its service see Rule 17(4 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or Rule 45(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or

re, or Rule 45411, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Fees rear need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United Slates or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 454[, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Ryles of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of certa

d oen-e,, , Q (2) As to who may save a subpoena and the manner of its service see Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or Rule 45411, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Fees rear need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United Slates or an officer or agency

ny time. 2 In this motion, the parties use the term "child sex abuse imagery" or CSAM as a synonym for the inappropriate term, "child pornography." See United States v. Larson, No. 5:19-CR-50165-RAL, 2023 WL 196171, at •1 (D.S.D. Jan. 17, 2023) ("Pornography connotes a certain aspect of consent that is impossibl

ATERIALS Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and the Government of the United States Virgin Islands ("Government"), by their respective counsel, move pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c), and the authority of the Court to administer proceedings before it, for approval of an agreed- upon protocol authorizing counsel fo

ny time. 2 In this motion, the parties use the term "child sex abuse imagery" or CSAM as a synonym for the inappropriate term, "child pornography." See United States v. Larson, No. 5:19-CR-50165-RAL, 2023 WL 196171, at •1 (D.S.D. Jan. 17, 2023) ("Pornography connotes a certain aspect of consent that is impossibl

) JAMES EDWARD STALEY ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) ) Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR ORDER REGARDING REVIEW OF VIDEOMATERIALS Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c) and the authority of this Court to administer its proceedings, and finding good cause established in the stipulated motion filed by