Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

-5 18205iBiscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Fldrida:33160 16 .17 APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF C.A.. 18 JACK.HILU.ESQ: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, RA 19 - 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 20 21. APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF: 22 ISIDRO GARCIA, Esq. GARCIA LAW FI

deral Crime Victim's Rights Act challenging the extraordinary plea deal Epstein entered into with the federal government. See Jane Doe No. I, et at v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1002 (11th Cir. 2014).2 Edwards has continued for 10 years to prosecute that action in which Epstein is an Intervenor. 2 Epstein ag

EY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and BURLINGTON & ROCICENBACH, P.A. 444 West Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Be

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that t

on the attached service list, by email, on March 12, 2018. Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq. David J. Vitale, Jr. Esq. SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 and BURLINGTON & ROCICENBACH, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite 350 444 West Railroad A

t page? Q. Page 19. You were asked: "I'm wondering, have you spoken to Jeffrey Epstein about this since these allegations came out in this suit in the United States? Have conversations happened there?" Oo On KH MP WN BP PRR PP Pe RH to OW HU PWN REO communication with Jeffrey Epstein, correct? A. I disclosed

ystems Administrator www. phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010783 APPEARANCES: On behalf of Plaintiffs: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-3626 BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. [email protected] On behalf of Defendant: COLE, SC