Epstein Secrets

in: I. I am an Assistant United States Attorney in the Office of Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (the "United States Attorney's Office" or the "Government"). In that capacity, I am familiar with the investigation underlying this request. I respectfully submit this

and is heavily outweighed be an "electronic communications service" or "remote computing service" for purposes of the non-disclosure provisions of the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq. 5 EFTA00102646 by, the Government's interest in preserving the confidentiality of the criminal investigation and the

held that $1,000 minimum is available only to plaintiffs who suffer actual damages, and Doe had not raised a triable issue of fact of such damages. The United States Supreme Court, using a straightforward textual analysis, agreed with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. §2255 is also limited to those plaintiffs w

Page 15 Plaintiff's reliance on In re Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Konop v. Hawaiin Airlines, Inc.), 355 B.R. 225 (D. Hi. 2006), is misplaced. Unlike the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. §2707(c), endnote', at issue in the Hawaiian Airlines case, the presumptive minimum is tied to the minor or person proving that she or h

d there are a number of factors that are considered, the first being, and I think it is important to recognize, Mr. Epstein was granted immunity by the United States Attorney in the District of Florida for the conduct that I believe he is going to be questioned about. And I don't believe that it is appropriate f

a hopelessly broad subpoena. It is abusive civil discovery and on the face of it appears to violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Stored Communications Act, federal laws. The email seeks -- excuse me. The subpoena seeks every email that has ever been sent to that account or sent from that account. Tha

ined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both. (b) Of a ward.--Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or

al. 1,15 Plaintiff's reliance on In re Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Konop v. Hawaiin Airlines, Inc.I 355 B.R. 225 (D. Hi. 2006), is misplaced. Unlike the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. §2707(c), endnote', at issue in the Hawaiian Airlines case, the presumptive minimum is tied to the minor or person proving that she or h