Epstein Secrets

Cir. Apr. 26, 2002) (summary order) (plea agreement does not bind other districts "even if the plea agreement purports to bind `the Government' or the "United States"); United States v. Bruno, 159 F. Supp. 3d 311, 321 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) ("The Court disagrees with Defendant's argument that the phrase `United States'

"United States"); United States v. Bruno, 159 F. Supp. 3d 311, 321 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) ("The Court disagrees with Defendant's argument that the phrase `United States' shows an intent to bind all United States Attorney's Offices. Rather, the plea agreement covers only Defendant's liability in the SDFL."). As the S

r v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 40 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 35 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 35 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Alzmad, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 112 United States v. Ahmed, 10

moved for an entry of a protective order for materials produced in discovery and submitted a proposed order for the consideration of the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, the United States District Judge who was then overseeing the Giu&•e v. Maxwell civil litigation. (See 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP), Dkt. Nos. 38 & 39-1). On

. PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP By: Brad S. Karp Eric S. Goldstein ) Jonathan Hurwitz ) Jessica S. Carey 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10019-6064 Tel: Fax: Attorneys for Defendant The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. EFTA00284558 Case 1:08-md-01963-RWS Document

/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed el

10 Civ. 01226 (RWS), is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/29/2011) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:08-md-01963-RWS, 1:10-cv- 01226-RWS (ab) EFTA00284560 Jay B. Kasner Case Name: Financial Trust Co.,

motion misstated the right-to-access law. To the contrary the Opinion correctly summarized the law, and properly identified the leading cases from the United States Supreme Court and this Court. See, e.g., Sp.App. 16-26. The gravamen of the appellants' argument centered on—and many of the panel's questions were

Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 303.831.7364; [email protected] 801.585.5202; [email protected] Court- Judge/ Agency appealed from: Hon. Robert W. Sweet, District Judge (S.D.N.Y.) Please check appropriate boxes: Has movant notified posing counsel (required by Local Rule 27.1): {} Yes No (explain)

In re The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative and ERISA Litigation, 08 M.D.L. 1963 (S.D.N.Y.) (RWS) (the "MDL Action"), pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet. A copy of the Notice was served on plaintiff's counsel.

L. 1963 (S.D.N.Y.) (RWS) (the "MDL Action"), pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet. A copy of the Notice was served on plaintiff's counsel. 4. In August 2008, the MDL Panel joined for consolidated or coordinated pretrial purposes