Epstein Secrets

intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(aX3). ECF No. 1. The indictment alleges that Thomas, in his capacity as a correctional officer at the Metropolitan

ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut

intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(aX3). ECF No. 1. The indictment alleges that Thomas, in his capacity as a correctional officer at the Metropolitan

ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut

intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(aX3). ECF No. 1. The indictment alleges that Thomas, in his capacity as a correctional officer at the Metropolitan

ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut

ointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). B. BradylGiglio Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitut

K --- Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 36 Filed 06/09/20 Page 5 of 9 arises where the Government conducts a joint investigation with another agency." United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In determining whether the prosecution has cond