Epstein Secrets

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

ntails between Drew Oosterbaan, Marie Villatana, Robert Senior,Jeff Montan, Sigal Mandelker, Karen Atkinson, Alex Acosta, Rolando Garcia and Myesha Braden regarding status of CEOS plans to meet with counsel for Epstein and status of indictment review B-112 245/2008 Email chain between Marie Villafan

lm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (56!) 820-8777 July 10, 2008 NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH

e victim all asked to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States' Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases,

, and London, England. Ms. Villafafia remained in civil practice, specializing in intellectual property litigation until 2001, when she was hired by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami. While she enjoyed civil practice, Ms. Villafafia for many years had wanted to be an Assistant United States Attorney. T

elf with the case and to re-connect with the victims to prepare them for potential trial testimony (Exhibits B-103, B-104). On January 14, 2008, Ms. Braden and I went over charging and investigative strategy, as well as her next trip to West Palm Beach (Exhibit B- 105). I also asked the agents to compil

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of A

nt, UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014558 1/29/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Drew Oosterbaan and Myesha Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 thru P

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of A

nt. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014558 1/29/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Drew Oosterbaan and Myesha Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 thru P

citizenship for their children by giving birth on U.S. soil while on vacation." The legislation would bar "any non-immigrant foreigner from entering the United States 'for the primary purpose of obtaining United States citizenship for a child:" Maryland County Declined ICE Retainer Request On Rape Suspect. The Was

om an 18- month investigation in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation." The Vail Police Department "initiated an investigation after Braden's resignation in November 2018 after he was arrested by Glenwood Springs police and charged with soliciting a prostitute. Braden worked for the tow

/ UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June IS, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The in

to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation P-014558 1/29/2008 email from Marie Villafafia to Drew Oosterbaan and Myesha Braden regarding status of meeting in DC and concerns regarding delay. Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) Investigative Privilege P-014559 thru P