4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
7 / 4
Mentions
g interest in "weighing the interests advanced by the parties in light of the public interests and the duty of the courts," Nixon, 435 U.S. at 602. See United States v. Cicale, No. 05-CR-60-2 (NGG), 2018 WL 388941, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2018) ("Compelling interests warranting closure of a courtroom—and, by ex
s, to 12 EFTA00075086 cagsVg14,4 c St Ptet4D4s4kiwATIPAteSEilg jkle::747;7;?i, 144f319 wit, transportation of minors, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(a). 16. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and others known and
le v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 (2d Cir. 2004), before the interested parties have an opportunity to seek review of the orders. See, e.g., United Staten. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at •8 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2014) ("The Court stays immediate disclosure of these materials to permit Def
id not see him in person after 2005 when she was photographed with him at a party. At the time, she was dating billionaire Gateway computer founder Ted Waitt. 3/13 EFTA00075147 CasECES5atall*PmertIctiAtIOIC8te292Cil&t90/28/2b3gE144914802 161 @Clive Coote Walt Disney K REX Shutte rstock A source clos
mining when the offense conduct ended, especially when they would almost single-handedly increase the recommended sentencing range by over 10 years. Cl United States v. Cordoba-Murgas, 233 F.3d 704, 708 (2d Cir. 2000) (acknowledging that enhancements based on relevant conduct may result in sentences that are "ex
ad nothing to do with and was not personally responsible for. That result would be fundamentally unjust and contrary to the purposes of sentencing. See United States v. Reuter, 463 F.3d 792, 793 (7th Cir. 2006) 9 EFTA00156349 (Posner, J.) ("A judge might reasonably conclude that a sentence based almost entirel
tant testified that by 2002 Ms. Maxwell had "moved on" from Epstein, had stopped coming to the office, and had begun a long-term relationship with Ted Waitt. (Tr. 2370-71, 2374, 2378-80). testified that whom he recalled seeing for the first time towards the end of his employment in 2002, "immediately t
o take her deposition, "claiming she needed to return to the United Kingdom to be with her deathly ill mother"[Km] with no intention of returning to the United States.[98] However, Maxwell returned within a month to attend Chelsea Clinton's wedding.1981 In January 2020, it was reported that Maxwell had refused to allo
sold for US$15 mfilion.E9-1 Following her personal and professional involvement with Epstein, Maxwell was romantically linked for several years to Ted Waitt, founder of Gateway Computers.[33][1521 She attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton in 2010 as Waitt's guest.[ 32.1 Maxwell helped Waitt obtain and
take her deposition, "claiming she needed to return to the United Kingdom to be with her deathly ill mother"11091 with no intention of returning to the United States.1981 However, Maxwell returned within a month to attend Chelsea Clinton's wedding.E98) In January 2020, it was reported that Maxwell had refused to allow
s sold for US$15 million.(21 Following her personal and professional involvement with Epstein, Maxwell was romantically linked for several years to Ted Waitt, founder of Gateway Computers.133I'521 She attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton in 2010 as Waitt's guest.13al Maxwell helped Waitt obtain and ren
Entities connected to both United States and Ted Waitt

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Hawaii
LOCATION
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON